Data Availability &amp; Interpretationhttp://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/9/ShowForum.aspxDiscussions about trade data.enCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Debug Build: 61019.2)Re: South African Apricot 2007http://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/thread/200.aspxFri, 27 Mar 2009 14:48:17 GMT7cf73f7e-7553-4d74-96cd-ddc75d72ba9d:200markie0http://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/thread/200.aspxhttp://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=9&PostID=200<FONT face=Helv size=2><FONT face=Helv size=2> <P>Data Reference: South Africa 2007 received on 19 February 2008;&nbsp;published on&nbsp;31 October 2008</P> <P>Original&nbsp;South African data of commodity code "080910" was checked and yes it's big as mentioned. </P> <P>We have asked for further clarification to the data provider. When the revised data is available, it will be processed soon.</P></FONT></FONT>South African Apricot 2007http://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/thread/199.aspxFri, 27 Mar 2009 14:44:20 GMT7cf73f7e-7553-4d74-96cd-ddc75d72ba9d:199markie0http://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/thread/199.aspxhttp://comtrade.un.org/cf/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=9&PostID=199A Trade Map user has pointed out that South Africa's export <BR>quantities for apricot (HS 080910) looks too big in 2007 and he is <BR>right. This outlier quantity has also been taken into account in the<BR>aggregates at 4 and 2-digit level. I have checked the COMTRADE data <BR>and I have found the same quantities.